SSTS Permitting Sandbox site
Compliance Inspection Compliance Inspection Compliance Inspection # CI-2020-2265, Submission # Submission-2020-2394, UID # 29075
Status: System Replaced
Status: System Replaced
System Status
| System status on date: | 07/20/2020 | System Status: | Noncompliant |
System - Noncompliant
| Reason(s) for noncompliance: | Soil Separation (Compliance Component #4) - Failing to protect groundwater |
Property Information
| Property Information: | |||||||||||||||||
| Owner's representative: |
|
||||||||||||||||
[
]
[ Search Result Limit: Impact on Public Health
| System discharges sewage to the ground surface: |
No | System discharges sewage to drain tile or surface waters: |
No | System causes sewage backup into dwelling or establishment: |
No |
| Verification method(s): | Searched for surface outlet Searched for seeping in yard/backup into home Excessive ponding in soil system/D-boxes Homeowner testimony (See Comments/Explanation) Other methods not listed (See Comments/Explanation) |
Comments/Explanation: | None of the above found |
Tank Integrity
| System consists of seepage pit, cesspool, drywell, or leaching pit: |
No |
| Sewage tank(s) leak below their designed operating depth: |
No |
| Verification method(s): | Probed tank(s) bottom Examined construction records Other methods not listed (See Comments/Explanation) |
| Comments/Explanation: | Lowered underwater camera into tanks - baffles and tank walls OK. Lift pump and alarm were operational at the time of inspection. |
Other Compliance Conditions
| Maintenance hole covers are damaged, cracked, unsecured, or appear to be structurally unsound: |
No |
| Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety: |
No |
| System is non protective of groundwater for other conditions as determined by the inspector: |
No |
| Explain: | See Report |
Date of Install
| Date of install known: | Yes |
| Date of installation: | 01/01/1979 |
Soil Separation
| Shoreland/Wellhead Protection/Food, beverage, lodging? | Yes |
| Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock: |
No |
| Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.: |
No |
| Verification method(s): | Conducted soil observation(s) (Attach boring logs) Other (See Comments/Explanation) |
| Comments/Explanation: | See Report |
| A. Bottom of distribution media: | 2.33 Decimal Feet |
| B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock: | 0.83 Decimal Feet |
| C. System separation: | 0 Decimal Feet |
| D. Required compliance separation: | 3 Decimal Feet |
Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP
| Is system operating under an Operating Permit: | No |
| Is the system required to employ Nitrogen BMP: | No |
Comments and File Attachments
| Comments or recommendations: | See Report |
| Attach Files: |
|
16250_Morgan_Ave_N.pdfCertification
| Inspector: |
Please search for and choose SELF/OTHER if what you need does not appear in the list
|
| Inspector Email Address: | brian@midwestsoiltesting.com |
Terms
Certification
By submitting this form I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of the future
system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system, inadequate
maintenance, or future water usage
Invoice #5789 (07/24/2020)
| Charge | Cost | Quantity | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| added 07/24/2020 11:39 AM $41 Flat Fee |
$41.00 | x 1 | $41.00 |
| Grand Total | |||
| Total | $41.00 | ||
| Payment 07/29/2020 | $41.00 | ||
| Due | $0.00 | ||
Action: Print
Approvals
| Approval | Signature | Options |
|---|---|---|
| Applicant | Brian Humpal - 07/24/2020 11:39 AM 9ee7b6bf521569790d9dfe2c30bb541b 680d816f6e02ba519ea21a216388ef64 | |
| #1 Compliance Inspection Accepted | Tyler Dale - 07/30/2020 1:25 PM c9c6dfacac930eb10af970c5f3c5c502 50095d0ac4a07cdc6da764dacfb0b2a7 |
Inspection has been approved. All signatures have been obtained.
| Text: | |
| File(s): |
| Text: | 07-22-2020: Missed call from Mary Cullen at 11:40a.m. PMO 07-23-2020: I called Mary at 11:23a.m. We discussed next steps after failed inspection on her septic system. Mary wanted me to recommend a contractor(s) to work with regarding the failed SSTS. I told her I do not recommend contractors and that she needs to do her own research and call contractors to get quotes for work. We discussed the reason why system failed and she disagrees with the inspector. I summarized the reason for system failure and the process after the County receives notification that a system is non-compliant. Mary requested additional information. I emailed her steps in the process of installing a septic system. Email attached. PMO 07-23-2020: Mary responded to email saying conversation was infuriating. PMO 07-24-2020: Emailed Mary back asking if she had further questions. Email attached. PMO |
| File(s): |
| Compliance Letter Type: | Failed System, Notice and Order to Comply, Separation | Who's signature should be on the letter? | Tyler Dale | Permit number to reference in "No Replace" letter: | |
| Was the letter sent? | Yes | Compliant/Non-Compliant: | Noncompliant |
| Certificate of Compliance: |
| Letter of Non-Compliance: |